Is pricey pussy worth it?

[fljoe]

If what you are looking for is to rent a pussy for an hour (or less), than no, paying for a pricey pussy is probably not worth it. At the end of the day, a pussy is a pussy is a pussy, although some come in nicer packaging than other. But there are many very nicely packaged pussies in the market price range.

If however you are looking for something more than a pussy (whatever that is: a conversation, a certain ambiance, an ability and willingness to play out your special fantasy, a "date-like" feeling, a rented mistress, the illusion of exclusivity and luxury, etc.), than it may be worth paying the higher rates that the SPs of your choice is demanding.

You can get a decent bed in almost any market price motel around the city, and a good one at market price in many hotels. But if you want something more than a decent to good bed, if the decor and the quality of the bed sheets matters to you, if the quality of the customer and room service matters to you, if the feeling of luxury and the designer robe is important to you, than paying twice (or more) the market price for a night at Le Germain will be worth it. If all you want is a clean bed in a safe location, and anything better than sleeping in your car will do, than there's no point in paying for a room at Le Germain.

 

[cocopop]

Can we take them home?:

 

[Lil Mz Qu33nz 24/7]

You raise a good point jjf but this isn't about money or education or good jobs. It's about respect and the calling our esteemed ladies "pussy". What are we...dicks?

All of us seek the services of SPs for our own different reasons and we have no excuse for calling them by the colloquial names for their body parts. They are people and from what I have seen and read, many of them are highly intelligent articulate ladies and valuable contributors to this board.

Good for Lauren and Adelle for taking the slaggers to task for their degrading terminology and deplorable attitudes.

Some of you have shown a lot of class. Unfortunately........ fill in the blanks!

 

[red top]

That's the key point, what do you have available to spend.

Don't bitch cause I may have more.

It's not about the dollar per hour its about the dollar per experience.
Some times a one hour is a waste of money and a four hour dinner is a bargain

It's all about what do YOU want and forgetting the expectations of others.
If you wanted someone else to have expectations about sex and money get a wife.

....

Hijack of post from an anonymous intruder
Sometimes a special experience can be a once in a lifetime thing and worth the extra cost.

But then again sometimes it is just a waste, you need to know what you like and want, before you can go looking for expectations of it in another person.

....


Now get back to bed and make me cum again

 

[Campong T]

I agree with the posters. If you can't afford it you will be disappointed.

There are women as attractive and talented in bed as I am who charge much less.

The gentlemen who book higher rates can afford it. Whether it's 200 or 2000 make absolutely no difference to them. They are willing to pay my rate because they enjoy me as a person, not because I can wrap my ankles behind my head. Men who pay the higher rates want extended dates, so if they can't have fun with you outside of bed, or take you to an Opera and know you'll appreciate it, or go to a 5 star in NYC without you making a fool of yourself... It doesn't matter how good you are in bed. He'll never book again.

Price is not an indicator of looks or menu items. It is decided by one thing: volume.

I need to make X number of dollars to pay my bills, pu money into my savings account and still have some spending money. I don't want to see more then five or so gents a month. Thus my prices have to be what they are. I personally will not see multiple people in a day, much less see 7 guys in a week. Not a knock on those who do (I used to). However, I'm not willing to do it.

Also, I want dinner dates, overnight and vacations together. So once again, by setting a higher price point I will meet people who are a) interested in longer engagements. B) Can afford it.

Another consideration, I am looking for mistress arrangements. Those arrangements are lower then what appears on my website, however, they need to be able to 1: afford a frequent ongoing relationship 2) enjoy spending large amount of time together.

So it's not about her going down until she gets lock jaw or what her menu items are, or how perfect her looks are. If you look at it from that perspective you miss the point and will unquestionably be disappointed.

A last consideration - women on the high end often have careers. So if she takes a two hour appointment for $200 or a $1000 overnight, she is in fact loosing money, because she makes more at her job. So they set price points that make it worth their time.

 

[Pompal 09.]

Ms. Lauren, just because someone doesn't want to book you for more than an hour does not mean they can't afford you, maybe they just don't want to take more time out of their busy lives than they need to.

My god, I can't understand why anyone would pay to just talk? I can on the other hand understand if the gentleman is out of town and would like to have company watching a show, or a movie although I would rather ask a stranger to join me and pay for their ticket than hire a high priced escort.

Oh oh, am I going to be accused of being a TROLL?

 

[starsky_1212]

Nice start!:great: Kinda saying nothing, but its not about critiquing writing skills:neutral:


Good! You are expressing a PERSONAL opinion, not saying that the universe should evolve as you see fit (BTW- your thoughts on shrinks & counsellors?)

VERY Good!

See above



:Not by me, but ya gotta ask all the scary dudes with the Green Handles!

 

[who am i?]

That's just common sense. At no point did I suggest otherwise. If they can afford me, they have a wide selection of other high end companions they may choose to book. Stating the obvious.

As far as taking time out of their busy schedules - they aren't. We join them on business trips, so after a day at work, they come back to spend the evening with us. That's why multiple days are generally desired instead of one overnight.



Who said we're "Just" talking. Of course there's other things going on. Some people feel they have better intimate experiences when they're with people they also enjoy talking to. It's about the whole experience. The world is full of people that are nothing like you, and people that are just like you. It's important to wrap your head around that. No one has to justify their desires to you, anymore then you have to justify your desires.

Yeah, you are being a troll.

 

[Mr.Explosion]

OK, I try and stay out of the Lobby, because it is mostly fluff. But not only is this thread actually interesting, but if I post in it, then the review I plan to post next will be my 69th post and that's a numerical opportunity too good to pass up.



That's a reasonable question, even if it could have been phrased 'high-end provider'.



Which received some reasonable answers, like the above.



But there is something wrong with this answer, because it is inconsistent with Ms Summerhill's other posts about screening clients for all kinds of social virtues, like class and politeness and respect. The guy who procures a service just because he can is highly likely to regard everything as a commodity ripe for buying, and that kind of attitude is a socially invidious one lurking beneath the shiny exterior. It needs pointing out here that the higher price buys a bigger fantasy, but that bigger fantasy most certainly starts buying up much more of the provider's personality than more regular price points. Is the guy who wants to spend his money buying up serious amounts of personality really the kind of guy who deserves all those social virtues being attributed to him?



Though barotti goes too far. Higher end providers are making all kinds of personal and market decisions, I'm sure (it's not just some vaguely defined 'has issues'). But he's right to suspect there's also some bullshit cropping up here . . .



Says the white knight paying $250 to stick his dick into some mid-price-point SP, who also - when that itch calls - eschews the nightclub and heads for an incall. Let's be real about the locale of virtue here, lest those who throw rocks find their glass house very small indeed.



And then Ms St Clair reintroduces sanity. Note mutual respect gets mentioned before price point.

But then . . .



Please don't mix up chivalrous and virtuous with white knights. We should really reserve the term chivalry for those guys who practice it most of the time, not just on an anonymous board via a bit of butt kissing. I, for one, don't find anything chivalrous about guys cheating on their wives and families. I understand that comment will not win me many friends, but honestly, chivalry really ought to be reserved for different sets of behaviours than what alot of us on the board practice. Notice I am not exempting myself from the criticism. Nor am I saying just seeing an SP makes a guy a bad person. I'm just saying that all we can really say of white knights is that they're internet good guys, and I'm happy to be an internet white knight if there's a troll being a misogynist idiot. But chivalry is something you accomplish, that you demonstrate, out there in the real world in relationships that really matter. Quite frankly, most white knights are not doing that. Again, that might make me enemies by those not thinking it through.

Well that's my 68th post and soon I can revert to the incall/outcall section! As to the actual question: higher priced SP's are not my thing, not because of cash flow issues, but because I just don't have need to buy up anymore of any SP's personality than I do in an hour's time with a mid-price-point SP. I have used proper grammar, so that the Bear's and Dreamblade's in the audience do not jump on me. Though it ought to be said that Bear litters his posts with capital letters, odd fonts, and emoticons, which is a juvenile way of making points. Actual knowledge of grammatical correctness would eliminate the need for such over-emphasis.

 

[who da man?]

Wow, Brad I am impressed. The women love you and you can write. I wish I could write like you. :

I have never judged anyone for whom they see, how much they spend and why they hobby. It's none of my business and frankly I really don't give a crap.

I hobby because I love doing the nasty with as many gorgeous women as possible before I die without the headache of having strings attached. Having said this I really don't see the need in my opinion and for my preferences to spend more than I need to. I am the same way with other individuals I hire not related to the hobby. I don't mind paying someone a fair dollar, but at the end of the day what I want for my money is to perceive that I have received my fair value of services or product for the dollars I paid out.

I guess what I am really trying to say is, do whatever floats your boat.

John "A" feels good spending 5000 bucks , good for him, as long as he is doing a happy dance after the session it's all good, and the same goes for John "b" who just paid a couple of hundred bucks.

This goes the same for the ladies, do whatever works for you. If you are happy with your price point and you are making the cash, who cares what others think. I book based on what I want and who tickles my fancy at the price point I see value for me. This is really all I care about.

I apologize for the grammatical errors and writing style in advance in case the Paragraph Police is around!: :slap:

 

[MARIE LOVES SCOTT]

There are some very good points being made in this thread for both sides.

I prefer the good looking ladies with good service at a reasonable price.

 

[Kyle S]

What I choose to pay is my own business, and you missed the point of my post. I was addressing the way Barotti was calling SP's. His misogynist attitude makes the rest of clients look bad, and has driven some wonderful women out of the industry in the past.



Dude, for some poster on "an anonymous board," you seem to jump to a buttload of conclusions about me. Those who have met me (Adelle, for example), will attest that anything I say or do here, I do in RL. I support those in the sex industry because I think it has a huge potential as a tool for female empowerment as well as sexual liberation for both genders. Yes, I often agree with what Lauren says, but for no other reason than we seem to come from a similar place mentally.

Barotti and his ilk, I've seen them before. I've kicked them out of bars I've worked in. You treat women with respect, and that's final. Hiding behind a keyboard is no excuse.

 

[Natie]

You are so fucking funny dreamasskissingblade! :beurk:

 

[Been]

Good comeback, Barotti! How can I contend with such a sharp wit as you?

 

[enfriendemy]

I can feel the love! I am on a diet so I cannot say pass the pop-corn. Anyone have a suggestion for a diet snack? Diet pop-corn taste like cardboard.

 

[racism is unbecoming]

Well dude, I'm sure neither of us gives much of a fig about each other's viewpoint, and other lobby-goers still less, so it's probably pointless to wonder who missed whose point. But for the record, I agree with your first point, that decent dudes should censor misogynist attitudes. So we're in the same boat on that one. But you then seemed to think I was making assumptions about you, which I was not. I might be stoopid Brad, but I'm pretty sure there is a difference between an assumption and an hypothesis. I was venturing an hypothesis, that alot of white knights talk the talk without really walking the walk. I was then suggesting that wherever that was in fact the case, women and men combined should be wary of watering down what it really is to walk the walk. That is, real chivarly takes place not just on an internet board, and yeah, that might mean if we're not walking the walk off the board we ought to be 'man enough' to criticize ourselves. That is what I meant when I asked for white knight and chivarly to be kept separate. To be frank, if you walk the walk off the board too, then you're the kind of guy I would think highly of. If not, it's better to be a bit self-critical than to over-compensate on an anonymous board!

But no-one ought to care about our views on that matter. Now that my 69th post is out of the way http://www.massageplanet.com/rboard/showthread.php?9202-Parker-Cupids, and ironically devoted to reviewing a classy and beautiful woman, I can offer another comment on the high-end provider question. I still think talk of raw ability to pay probably obscures the point of high-end providers, and I also think talking about what they offer might be less important than talking about what clients want. I guess it's the old economics question, of whether particular sectors of the market are supply-side driven or demand-side driven? I tend to think, though am open to good counter-arguments forcing me to think about it differently, that there is a demand for certain levels of escapism. The perfect woman, where perfect means not actually real. The great sex, the fantastic conversation, the sharing of secrets, without the rest of the woman, the rest of the human, who has preferences and interests and so on that might get sublimated because that's what the paying is about. That's what I mean about paying for perfection, not reality. And of course, anyone who has been in a really good relationship would say reality beats perfection any day.

So what I'm wondering is whether the high-end providers are really demand-driven, where the demand is for a chimera, a women where you don't have to work hard to either appreciate the so-called 'flaws' or to just get over ourselves and be OK with a great woman who doesn't always do what we would like. Maybe that's why I wouldn't go for a high-end provider, because I already struggle to get over myself and take women for themselves (see, some self-criticism doesn't kill us), and so seeing a high-end provider might be like confirming my worst habits?

 

[Jamerican Steve]

Brad you have my head spinning trying to read your last post. Jeeez I must be dense!:tongue:

 

[Helpp]

Ms. Summerhill I am devastated at you calling moi a troll. :neutral:

I was just about to call you and book an wonderful week in the Philippines. We would have stayed at the 7 Stones Boracay. It's a wonderful hotel, but now after the name calling I am not sure I can entertain the thought. We would have eaten at the finest restaurants, sipped on the most expensive wines, and I would have treated you like the princess you claim to be, but all lost. PFFT, gone with the wind!

 

[Archer]

JB you are one ugly troll dude!::

 

[U_S_S_Enterprise]

Wasting of site bandwidth and disk space. Well done!